Comments on: Cow replaces the Tiger as India’s national animal

By: A

Thu, 06 Jan 2011 11:04:05 +0000

Brilliant Article

By: H-3

H-3 — Wed, 05 Jan 2011 18:42:17 +0000

Lol @ dung slinging and Mr. Sikka Singh

By: crazy

crazy — Wed, 05 Jan 2011 16:30:26 +0000

“In a way mirror our society. They get less, deliver more, are peaceful, and non-vegetarian”

nonveg??

By: Pavanaja U B

Pavanaja U B — Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:37:33 +0000

There is a factual error. Tiger became national animal in 1973 only replacing lion. So it has not completed 50 yrs

By: Amulya

Amulya — Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:20:35 +0000

it also points out condition that why tiger were opted as national animal not cow being more prdt

By: Indian Borat

Indian Borat — Thu, 25 Nov 2010 14:46:16 +0000

Oh no no can our Pamela be the national animal…
She can do a lot more then just wat an average cow wud do…
Im sure Pam can beat the cow in all aspects..
More dairy farm can come up thus fostering employment…Then the p industry can also expect to make some money wit our national animal…
Pls pls Pamela…Pls…

By: BuffaloLover

BuffaloLover — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:09:41 +0000

I see a hint of racism here . Were the buffaloes ignored for the honour just because they are black . They do possess all the similar qualities and in fact they give creamier milk.

By: Adelong

Adelong — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:37:48 +0000

Collecting myself…’cause it cracked me up!

By: Tanay

Tanay — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 10:57:57 +0000

Really entertaining to read…