Angelina Jolie “When Brad bores me, I turn to Faking News”

Faking News

Brad Pitt “I read Faking News to keep Angelina happy”

India beats Pakistan by 2 words in a nail biting bilateral talk

Islamabad, Pakistan. In a major diplomatic victory over their arch rivals, India managed to beat Pakistan by a slender margin of 2 words when the two nations met for talks on the sidelines of the SAARC Home Ministers’ Conference here today. The words by both the countries were spoken over a duration of three days that included the foreign secretary level talks on Thursday and talks between the Home Ministers yesterday.

“Yes, we spoke two words more than them.” informed Indian Home Minister P Chidambaram about the outcome of the talks, which he claimed was fruitful and satisfactory for India.

Indo-Pak talks

Earlier talks between the two countries have been ending in boring draws

According to the official scorers, identity of whom remains a secret but widely believed to be Americans, India spoke first on almost all the occasions and amassed 34,749 words in total, which apparently indicated a paradigm shift from ‘accusatory’ to ‘exploratory’ mode.

“An accusatory mode can’t produce so many words. It mostly starts and ends in two words – fuck you.” said Hillary Clintwood, one of the purported official scorers for the talks.

In response, Pakistan too spoke magnificently, matching India’s stellar verbal performance neck and neck, but in the end fell short by 2 words i.e. scoring 34,747 words over the whole duration.

“It could well have ended in a tie, but Pakistan seems to have lost the count somewhere in between.” Hillary said.

Some experts believe that Pakistan might have purposely spoken a fewer words in order to give India a sense of achievement, so that they (Indians) stopped insisting upon talks over Hafiz Saeed and thus scoring even more words in the process. While there are others, mostly in Pakistan, who believe that Pakistan lost because of match fixing.

“It was a clear case of match fixing. Our people were already taking about replacing words like ‘dossiers’ with ‘hearts’ in the middle of the things. We all know that dossiers score more than hearts any day, so why was that change in strategy adopted? We have thrown away this contest I tell you.” alleged Hamid Gul, a keen follower of talks in Pakistan.

Back in India, the news has been largely received positively in all quarters, but it’s not yet clear what were those two words that helped the nation score this decisive victory.

“I guess it was ‘trust deficit’; once we mentioned it, Pakistan agreed to it and no further words were exchanged over the issue.” P Chidambaram said.

Possibly Related News:
  1. India Pakistan to work out a joint scam to boost bilateral ties
  2. Sunday Magazine: where are India Pakistan talks heading towards?
  3. Chidambaram to play Frisbee with Rehman Malik to boost bilateral ties
  4. Obama says sorry as NATO mistakenly bombs anti-India terror camp in Pakistan
  5. Pakistan arrests Indian parrot on charges of spying and sabotage

Reported by on Jun 26th, 2010 and filed under World. You can follow any responses to this report through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this report



7 Responses for “India beats Pakistan by 2 words in a nail biting bilateral talk”

  1. Manmohan Singh says:

    I am proud of UPA gov’s achievement! plz vote for us again. plz plz plz

  2. Ravish says:

    Superb! this is as good as it can get! PP u r GOD! :)

  3. nirmal says:

    absolutely good !! comments by pagal patrakar

  4. John says:

    PP! Tussi great ho!!
    Nobody comes even close! lol

    i bet this is really what happens in our bilateral talks

    maybe our diplomats will have ice cream eating contests next

  5. Wonder by how much the tax payer is poorer, now that 34,747 ± 2 words have been spoken

  6. good 1…

    PP contest for elections

  7. amiya says:

    It was a clear case of match fixing – I second that

Leave a Reply

Click here to visit Faking News in Hindi

 



Blog of Pagal Patrakar

Recent Comments

Content of this website, unless categorized as “Editorial”, is a work of fiction. Readers are advised not to confuse the "news reports" of Faking News as being genuine and true.
© Faking News 2008-2011 | powered by WordPress and Gabfire themes | Sitemap | Contact Us